GORDON, William 2nd of Farskane 2
- Born: About 1647
- Marriage (1): HAMILTON?, E. 1
User ID: B998.
General Notes:
Crommellat
".... Before I end the Genealogie of Cairnborrow and their Cadents I must tell you that Severalls of their Posterity are extinct, only the family of Artloch is represented by William (?) Gordon of Drumwhyndle and William Gordon of Farsken, two Brothers, sons of William Gordon a Second Son of Artlochs who first coft Farsken."
from Balbithan MS 2
William married E. HAMILTON?.1 (E. HAMILTON? was born about 1655.)
Marriage Notes:
"Rathven. (S. PETER, APOSTLE.)
The churches of Rotht-uen and Freschane, both in the diocese of Aberdeen, were annexed by Bishop William in 1483.
The kirk of Freschane, Forscan, Farskin, or Faskin, was dedicated to the Virgin Mary. It stood in a field about a mile to the west of the town of Cullen, where the site is still pointed out. The three churches of Rathven, Dundurcas (now part of Rothes), and Bellie, were served by one minister in 1574. It is stated at the same period that 'Forsken neidis na reidare.'
A freestone slab, built into a wall at Farskane, initialed E. H., and dated 1677, presents a carving of the arras of Hamilton of Ruglen - a family, so far as I know, that never had any connection with the locality, unless it may have been that a laird of Farskane married a Hamilton. Gordons were designed of Farskane in 1049, how long before, or afterwards, I am not aware; but one of them, who joined Mar's rebellion, is said to have found a safe retreat for some time in a cave, which still bears his name, among the cliffs by the seashore.
In early times, a family was named Farskin, and designed of that Ilk. Farskin, or Faskin, is still a surname in Banffshire. The property, once owned by Hay of Rannes, now (1875) belongs to the Earl of Seafield.
from Epitaphs and Inscriptions
Note:
John Hamilton was born about 1665 and was created Earl of Ruglen only in 1697, so the above statement presents some difficulty and should be treated with caution.
The first laird of Farskane's wife is unknown. So if 1677 is correct, it may represent a death, in which case the information may refer to the first laird's wife. Or, as presented here, it may point to a marriage - of the third laird of Faskane. 1
|
